|
Päävalikko
Uutiset
viimeisimmät uutiset lyhennyksineen Julkaise
lähetä uutisesi suoraan selaimeltasi Vaikuttavaan tietotoimistoon Esittely
vaikuttavan tietotoimiston toiminta-ajatus Osallistu
tule mukaan Vaikuttavan tietotoimiston toimintaan Käyttäjät
kirjoittaudu sisään tai rekisteröidy käyttäjäksi Arkisto
artikkeleita järjestettynä aihekokonaisuuksiin Toimintakalenteri
tulevat tapahtumat, mielenosoitukset ja kokoukset Katalyytti
vaikuttava videojulkaisu | 
|
|
Olet ymmärtänyt hieman väärin...(+faktoja) (Pisteet: 1) satelliittipupu (satelliittipupu@pupu.fi) 12.09. 18:50Kyseinen "ennustus" on todellakin Nostradamus-kriitikko Neil Marshallin käsialaa. Se on pöljin mahdollinen esimerkki ennustuksesta, jonka toteutumista voidaan jäädä odottamaan. Sitten vain asiasta kiinnostuneet tutkijat tulkitsevat sitä miten vain haluavat. Neil Marshallin sivulta voi tosin huonolla englannin taidolla TULKITA(!!!!), että kyseinen "ennustus" olisi Nostradamuksen itsensä kirjoittama:
"If I make say a thousand prophecies that are fairly abstract for example:
In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb.
...
What do I mean by thunder--a storm? War? EarthQuake?"
tarkoittaa suomeksi suunnilleen:
"Jos TEEN tuhat ennustusta, jotka ovat melko abstrakteja, esimerkiksi:"
sekä
"Mitä MINÄ tarkoitan ukkosella--myrskyä? Sotaa? Maanjäristystä?"
Kyse on siis vain tulkinnasta. Voi tietenkin olla että Neil Marshallilla on psyykkisiä kykyjä, joita hän vain tällä tavalla parodioi, mutta se jääköön jokaisen lukijan omaan harkintaan ;-)
Seuraavassa on katkelma Neil Marshallin kirjoittamasta Nostradamus kritiikistä. Täydellisenä artikkeli löytyy osoitteesta: http://www.ed.brocku.ca/~nmarshal/nostradamus.htm
"
...
My Opinion:
What these shows usually forget to tell you (until the credits are rolling at the end (when nobody is watching)) is that these are INTERPRETATIONS of Nostradamus' writing.
Of course if they made a big deal about that and included a proper logical analysis of the Quatrains (using the Scientific Method) they would probably loose ratings since a lot of
people seem to enjoy believing that there are supernatural forces always at work in the Universe which science cannot explain. Wether that is true is a great philosophical question,
however the point is that when Nostradamus' writing's are put to the test (scientifically analysed), it shows that he really isn't as much as he has been built up to be.
At this point I would like to introduce to you what I call the "Infinite Monkey's Principle." Let's say that I have aquired an infinite amount of monkeys and an infinite amount of
typewritters or word processors (It doesn't matter). Of course, as far as we know that is impossible to do (Unless you buy factory direct from me--send 500 trillion dollars to me
(gold bullion only, liquid assets are not negotiable) But I digress... If these Infinite Amount of Monkeys are allowed to bang out whatever they want on the infinite typewriter, one
of them will produce the complete works of Shakespear.
How? Simple if the Monkey's write random garbage but in an infinite amount, eventually because of the simple fact that it is inevitable (simple probability thought shows this).
How does this apply to Nostradamus? Well I will show you...
If I make say a thousand prophecies that are fairly abstract for example:
In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb
Well let us analyse this. For Example what does City of God mean? It could be Mecca, Medina, Rome, Jeruselum, Salt Lake City, or any holy city depending on your religion.
What do I mean by thunder--a storm? War? EarthQuake? lots of stuff can be described by thunder. There are a lot of two brothers on this world (I think the Number runs among
the Billions) and fortress edure's what--Besiegement, Famine, etc? What Great Leader? How will he succumb? To what?
Now let the prophecy rest for a few years. Add a couple thousand more. Eventually, one of them will fit close enought with events that have happened in the future that the
prophecy will appear to come true. If you make enough prophecies and are intelligent enough to word them in such a way that they are abstract you become instant future see-er
person. For example those psychics you see every year that make predictions for the year 199-whatever generally get one or two out of ten predictions right. It is because they are
good guessers and that there is enough of them to make it seem like people can really predict the future.
...
"
Kiitos vaan. Ja hyvää jatkoa myös sinulle.
Satelliittipupu [ Vastaa | Root | Poista ] |
|
|